In spring 1938, on the heels of five years of persecution of
Jews in Nazi Germany that had recently extended to newly annexed Austria, it
was clear that Europe, and the world, were in the throes of a severe refugee
crisis. The term "refugee crisis" was essentially a euphemism, since
it was not an amorphous situation, but rather circumstances resulting directly
from masses of Jews fleeing dire Nazi persecution. Of course this was still nearly three years
before systematic mass murder would strike the Jews. And it was still six
months before orchestrated massive violence would erupt on November 9th and
10th in the pogrom that came to be known as Kristallnacht. Yet even in spring
1938 Germany's persecution of the Jews was real, humiliating, profoundly
painful and much too frequently, violent.
By the start of 1938 roughly one third of the 523,000 Jews residing
in Germany proper in 1933 had left, or were on the verge of leaving. In addition,
in the newly annexed German territories of Austria, Adolf Eichmann was poised
to employ new coercive tactics to expedite the emigration of as many of the
roughly 200,000 Jews of Austria as possible. He would be very successful.
In spring 1938, President Roosevelt and his Administration
decided to convene a conference to deal, ostensibly, with the problem of Germany's
fleeing Jews. Between the 6th and 15th of July, representatives from 32
countries met in the French spa town of Évian-sur-les-Bains. It became rapidly clear at the time, and even
clearer subsequently, that the Evian conference yielded no substantial
solutions to the ongoing stream of refugees.
The various countries' emissaries set forth reasons why their nations
could do little or nothing more than had already been done to help. Each emissary voiced hopes that other countries
would provide a solution. In short the
Evian conference was a dismal failure, ultimately fortifying the foundations of
the Nazis' Final Solution.
![]() |
|
"Evian, France, Representatives from
various nations, sitting around a table at the Evian Conference."
Courtesy of Yad Vashem Photo Archives
|
Today Europe and the world face another refugee crisis of
great proportions. Today's crisis appears in some ways much greater than that
of the 1930s, with more complex and diverse characteristics and causes. It extends
beyond several hundreds of thousands of persecuted persons belonging to one
ethnic group, in one nation. Now, millions of people in extremis around the
world are on the move and seek relief, refuge and a safe future. It is truly a global problem.
Since 2011 more than 4 million have fled the brutal and
bloody multi-sided war in Syria alone, a war that has left an estimated quarter
of a million dead. In Iraq, ISIS has
targeted its enemies killing, enslaving, terrorizing and raping large segments
of minority groups like the Yazidis, various Christians and those Muslims who
do not follow the ISIS line, engendering massive flight. As of the end of 2014, according to the
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 19.5 million people around the
world have been driven from their homes because of armed conflict.
When today's refugees reach the shores of Europe or other
safe havens, their new hosts are faced with daunting task of trying to accurately
determine their status: Who among these unfortunate people is in immediate life
threating danger. Whose life is threatened potentially? And who is seeking
safety from places where life is "merely" wretched beyond the
imagination of comfortable First World citizens? Clearly, weighty
considerations, and not a little prejudice and selfishness to boot, preclude
better-off countries from dramatically opening their doors wide to all the
refugees. Yet, perhaps, we can derive a modicum of wisdom from history to help
us grasp and deal sensibly and morally with this tragic, worsening situation.
When the world faced the crisis of Europe's persecuted
German and Austrian Jews in the 1930s and might have solved the problem
together, it failed miserably because it didn’t really try. It didn’t really want
to try.
What is needed today is a new international initiative to
aid the refugees - certainly not a sham like the Evian Conference, but a
sincere and resolute effort to actually make a practical difference for the
miserable millions. This would go a long
way towards the saving of many lives, and would also constitute an important
gesture toward making amends for the world's past failures of conscience and
action. Clearly many countries together can achieve more than one country
acting alone. There are a number of already existing international
organizations and agencies that could be part of such an effort, such as the
UN, the World Bank, and major relief and charity organizations.
In acting, we should all be guided by the saying attributed
to Rabbi Tarfon in the Pirke Avot (The Sayings of the Fathers), a compilation
of ethical teachings by early Jewish sages: "It is not incumbent upon you
to complete the work, but neither are you at liberty to desist from it."
It may not be achievable to succor all or even the greater part of the tens of millions who need our help, but that does not mean that organized and concerted efforts should not be made to do whatever can already be done. Those efforts should begin now.
It may not be achievable to succor all or even the greater part of the tens of millions who need our help, but that does not mean that organized and concerted efforts should not be made to do whatever can already be done. Those efforts should begin now.
Dr. Robert Rozett is the Director of the Yad Vashem
Libraries, author of Conscripted Slaves: Hungarian Jewish Forced
Laborers on the Eastern Front, Yad Vashem 2013, and co-editor with Dr. Iael
Nidam Orvieto, of a forthcoming anthology of letters written by Holocaust
Survivors and Allied soldiers after liberation to be published by Yad Vashem.


No comments:
Post a Comment